
The best compact smartphone for photography - Vivo X200 Pro Mini review
This little one is record-breakingly bright.
A global launch of the mini flagship phone in 2025 could become a problem for the Galaxy S25. Vivo's compact high-end phone shows what is possible—especially in the field of photography. Extremely slim bezels, a large Sony sensor, an XXL battery and fast charging are just some of the highlights on offer.Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict on the Vivo X200 Pro Mini
If you prefer compact smartphones, the X200 Pro Mini offers a more flagship feel than most other manufacturers. In terms of performance and battery life, you won't have to make any compromises with the small Vivo phone, and buyers of the Mini model also get the best of the best when it comes to displays. Not even the actual flagship X200 Pro achieved values of over 4,500 cd/m² in the practical APL18 test.
Even the X200 Pro Mini's camera system lacks any real points of criticism, although its periscope effects are somewhat weaker than those on its big brother due to the phone's slim and compact design. During everyday use, however, the Vivo phone still boasts excellent photo quality—its main camera with the large Sony sensor in particular has nothing to hide from any current high-end smartphone.
Unfortunately, the X200 Pro Mini isn't the perfect version of a compact flagship smartphone either, as the Vivo phone has been stripped of too many premium features (USB 3.2, ultrasonic sensor, ...) and its SoC being throttled is anything but optimal. How serious these deficits are during everyday use has to be weighed up individually. Having said that, the limitations our Chinese version faces (no Band 20, ...) should no longer be a problem when it's available globally.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
In China, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB flash storage is sold for 4,699 Yuan (approx. $650). Via our lender Trading Shenzhen, you can import the phone for $730.04. As Vivo has yet to announce a global launch, we can't give you any further information on the device's pricing.
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.99 YOUULAR [3 Pack Privacy Scre... 2. $11.98 TNKISRY Cover for Vivo X200 ... 3. $10.52 [4 Pack] for Vivo X200 Pro M... List Price: 700€ | 187 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $745.09 List Price: 899€ | 167 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.20" 2340x1080 416 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $999.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke... 2. $1,799.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un... 3. $799.00 Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An... | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2856x1280 495 PPI OLED | |
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi 15 Screen... 2. $19.98 for Xiaomi Charger 120W Hype... 3. $209.00 Xiaomi Watch S4 Smartwatch w... List Price: 760€ | 191 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.36" 2670x1200 460 PPI OLED | |
Sony Xperia 5 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: $575.00 List Price: 999€ | 182 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" 2520x1080 449 PPI OLED |
Table of Contents
- Verdict on the Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- Specifications of the Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- Case - Compact smartphone with an IP69 rating
- Connectivity - The compact phone only has USB 2.0
- Software - The Vivo X200 Pro Mini with Android 15
- Communication and GNSS - The compact Android phone with WiFi 7
- Telephone functions and call quality - The Vivo X200 Pro Mini with dual-SIM support
- Cameras - The small smartphone with big photo qualities
- Accessories and warranty - The Galaxy S25 competitor with a power supply unit
- Input devices and operation - The Vivo X200 Pro Mini with Face Unlock
- Display - The compact smartphone with OLED
- Performance - The compact Android phone with a high-end chip
- Games - The Vivo phone manages 120fps
- Emissions - The Vivo X200 Pro Mini with powerful sound
- Battery life - The small phone with a big battery
- Notebookcheck total rating
In contrast to the X100 series, Vivo is launching a compact version of its current flagship phone, the X200 Pro, this year. The little Mini version uses flagship hardware including a Zeiss triple camera in a compact size so that fans of smaller smartphones will hardly have to make any compromises.
If you would like to call the X200 Pro Mini your own, then you'll currently have to import the small flagship from Vivo. However, there are currently indications of a global launch, although an exact date is still pending.
Specifications of the Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Case - Compact smartphone with an IP69 rating
The Mini model not only features the same design language of the X200 Pro, but also the same high IP69 certification. This makes its case waterproof and dustproof and, in theory, you could even clean it with a high-pressure water jet. With a screen diagonal of 6.31 inches, the X200 Pro Mini is slightly larger than an Apple iPhone 16. Its weight of 187 grams is also remarkably low considering the large capacity of its battery.
Those interested in the compact flagship cell phone can choose between four color variants, which all have a frosted glass back. This means that grease residue from fingers shouldn't be a problem during everyday use. The manufacturer hasn't revealed which protective glass is used on the front and back.
The bezels around the 6.31-inch AMOLED panel are kept nice and thin, which gives the Mini model a very efficient display-to-surface ratio of over 91%. Its build quality is also first-class and the built-in buttons sit firmly in its metal frame.
Connectivity - The compact phone only has USB 2.0
The small flagship from the Chinese manufacturer offers very good connectivity overall, including Bluetooth 5.4, an IR blaster, Miracast and NFC, but the X200 Pro Mini doesn't draw on the full range that it could—it lacks eSIM support or storage expansion, an ultra-wideband chip or even the fast USB 3.2 port its big brother has. The latter in particular is a limitation that's difficult to understand from our point of view. This means that the Mini model has to do without wired image output and make do with slow data transfer.
Software - The Vivo X200 Pro Mini with Android 15
The X200 Pro Mini—which has so far only been presented for China—uses version 5 of the company's own OriginOS, which is based on Android 15 and supports a variety of languages. How long Vivo intends to support its compact flagship phone with updates has so far not been communicated. In the past, Vivo's software supply has been limited to three major Android versions and three years of security patches, which isn't very long compared to a Pixel 9 Pro or Galaxy S24. At the time of our test, the latest patches were dated December 2024.
Vivo's "Atomic Island" is inspired by Apple's Dynamic Island, alongside the phone's numerous AI functions. It displays real-time information, such as music playback or incoming calls, in a screen area around the punch-hole. There is no Google Play Store installed straight out of the box, but Google apps are available via the in-house V-Appstore and once installed, the Play Store can be used without any problems.
With the release of a global version for Europe, the Mini model will be delivered with Funtouch OS, just like the X200 Pro. The latter doesn't look as modern, but unlike the Chinese version, no Chinese services are pre-installed and Google applications can be used ex works.
Sustainability
No sustainability information is available for the X200 Pro Mini—it seems Vivo still has some catching up to do in this respect. The materials used and their recycled content have not been communicated transparently at all. It is also almost impossible to check whether the user can repair the device themselves.
The phone's packaging is likely plastic-free and was printed with inks based on soybean oil. However, the Vivo smartphone itself uses plastic materials for transportation (foil, shell).
Communication and GNSS - The compact Android phone with WiFi 7
Within home Wi-Fi networks, the X200 Pro Mini offers the best of the best standard in the shape of current WiFi 7, but the top-of-the-range phone can't use the 6 GHz channel. This means that only the 2.4 and 5 GHz ranges were used to establish a connection in our test using our reference router. However, this doesn't necessarily have to be the case with a global version of the device. Using the Asus ROG Rapture GT AXE11000, the X200 Pro Mini nevertheless revealed high and relatively constant transfer rates—measuring over 1,800 MBit/s at peak data reception.
In addition to its fast Wi-Fi, the Vivo phone uses the 5G standard, but only supports 17 LTE bands. As the Chinese versions generally have reduced frequency coverage, this shortcoming will not come to bear in a global version of the phone. Our CN version also doesn't support access to band 20 in the 4G network. The version with satellite communication is also probably only available for the Chinese market.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average Wi-Fi 7 (556 - 1806, n=59) | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Average of class Smartphone (49.8 - 1806, n=181, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Average Wi-Fi 7 (565 - 1875, n=59) | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Average of class Smartphone (52 - 1857, n=181, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Average Wi-Fi 7 (563 - 1945, n=46) | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Average of class Smartphone (508 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Average Wi-Fi 7 (451 - 1864, n=46) | |
Average of class Smartphone (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years) |
We took a closer look at the X200 Pro Mini's location services compared to the Garmin Venu 2 by taking them both with us on a bike ride. The Vivo phone uses dual-band GNSS to determine its position with an accuracy of around 1 to 2 meters.
The total distance determined by us on the Vivo smartphone was very similar to the Garmin smartwatch and only minor inaccuracies could be seen in the detailed route. Overall, the X200 Pro is very accurate and ideally suited for everyday navigation tasks.
Telephone functions and call quality - The Vivo X200 Pro Mini with dual-SIM support
The two microphones installed into the phone provide a pleasant call experience. Voice reproduction via the earphones is very clear and sufficiently loud. Similar to Samsung, an AI assistant can be used for conversations on request—for example for translations or summaries.
The compact flagship phone features fully-fledged dual-SIM support with two nano-SIM card slots and in the 5G network. We couldn't find an option to integrate an eSIM into the system in the device's system settings.
Cameras - The small smartphone with big photo qualities
On the front, the X200 Pro Mini has a 32-MPix lens with good photo quality—but Vivo has done without pixel binning and an autofocus. Nevertheless, selfies look rich in detail and feature a decent exposure, and you can even take videos at 60 frames per second and in UHD.
Still, a real highlight of the compact flagship phone is its camera system on the back—specifically the main camera which uses a Sony LYT-818. It not only features a particularly fast f/1.57 lens, but also a large sensor for a compact smartphone at 1/1.28 inches. By comparison, a Galaxy S24 uses a significantly smaller 1/1.56-inch sensor.


Standard mode (right) vs, ZEISS mode (left)
The phone's 50 MPix lens has OIS and a Zeiss T* coating. The T* stands for "Transmission Layer" and is intended to increase the transmission of visible light. This not only improves color quality, but also reduces reflectivity. During everyday use, the X200 Pro Mini boasts very good HDR calculation, which means that its dynamic range and exposure are usually really good. However, if you don't prefer oversaturated colors, then you should change from the standard mode to the more neutral ZEISS mode. Its photo quality in low light is also impressive for this product class.
Main camera aside, however, the Mini model has to accept some minor compromises compared to the X200 Pro. Its periscope telephoto lens including OIS doesn't have a resolution of 200 MPix, but only 50 MPix, and can only access a triple lossless zoom. Nevertheless, the compact smartphone delivers really good quality for the ranges between 2x and 10x that are predominantly used in everyday life. Even its digital 100x zoom is almost astonishingly detailed.
According to the data sheet, the phone's ultra-wide-angle lens should be identical to that of its big brother. The 50 MPix lens showed a lot of detail and good sharpness in our test photos and is one of the best of its kind.
The X200 Pro Mini also has a lot to offer when recording videos. Moving images support HDR at 4K60, LOG and can be recorded at up to 120fps in UHD quality. A Pro video mode is also on board. Lenses can be changed during recording when shooting in 4K30 and the color temperature is very well adjusted.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angleWe analyzed the main camera's color depiction in comparison to the actual reference colors under controlled lighting conditions. The 50 MP lens revealed some brightening and oversaturation when depicting the ColorChecker Passport, particularly in the green and brown tones. Thankfully, however, the X200 Pro Mini only showed a few outliers in terms of color fidelity (>10).


Accessories and warranty - The Galaxy S25 competitor with a power supply unit
The phone's scope of delivery includes a modular 90-watt fast-charging power supply, a protective cover, a data/charging cable (USB-A to USB-C), a SIM pin and a quick start guide. A screen protector is also installed on its screen, which Vivo says has been specially optimized for fingerprint recognition. Our loaner Trading Shenzhen has added an EU adapter for the charger and a USB OTG adapter to the scope of delivery of our Chinese version.
Our imported device comes with a 12-month warranty. In the event of a warranty claim, Trading Shenzhen offers the option of sending the smartphone to a German shipping address.
Input devices and operation - The Vivo X200 Pro Mini with Face Unlock
Thanks to the phone's compact design, the position of the buttons feels very ergonomic and their good pressure points allow for precise operation. Inputs on its 6.31-inch AMOLED display are also accurate. Thanks to its high refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, the mini flagship runs smoothly during everyday use and animations appear smooth. Haptic feedback provided by a vibration motor is just as important for everyday use. In the case of the X200 Pro Mini, this is precise and conveys a high-quality feel.
Unfortunately, the small flagship doesn't use the new 3D ultrasonic fingerprint sensor that the X200 Pro features, and you can instead "only" use an optical fingerprint sensor to unlock the phone biometrically. Nevertheless, the Vivo phone reliably unlocked the display during our test. You can also make use of less secure 2D facial recognition, which is based on a FaceUnlock function using the front camera.
Display - The compact smartphone with OLED

The X200 Pro Mini uses a 6.31-inch OLED panel that dynamically adjusts its frame rate from 1 Hz to 120 Hz based on LTPO technology. Thanks to its high 1,216p resolution of 461 PPI, the panel looks nice and sharp and has been certified twice by TÜV Rheinland (flicker-free, low blue light content).
While our measurement on a white background resulted in a peak brightness of "only" 1,863 cd/m², we achieved an incredible 4,526 cd/m² when displaying the APL18 pattern that is more relevant for everyday use. This is outstanding and corresponds to the phone's advertised peak brightness of 4,500 nits. First-class HDR effects are therefore guaranteed on the HDR10+ certified AMOLED display.
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1764 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.239
Vivo X200 Pro Mini AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy S24 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Google Pixel 9 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3" | Xiaomi 15 OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4" | Sony Xperia 5 V OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -111% | 2% | -52% | -57% | |
Brightness middle | 1764 | 1349 -24% | 2083 18% | 1021 -42% | 889 -50% |
Brightness | 1817 | 1369 -25% | 2016 11% | 1018 -44% | 898 -51% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 97 2% | 84 -12% | 98 3% | 97 2% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.84 | 3.3 -293% | 0.7 17% | 1.3 -55% | 1.4 -67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.53 | 5 -227% | 2 -31% | 2.9 -90% | 4.5 -194% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.4 -100% | 1.1 8% | 2.2 -83% | 1 17% |
Gamma | 2.239 98% | 1.97 112% | 2.22 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6646 98% | 6635 98% | 6560 99% | 6658 98% | 6456 101% |
* ... smaller is better
As is typical for OLEDs, PWM modulation is used to control the screen's brightness, which shows itself in the shape of a flickering display. According to Vivo, a form of eye protection is implemented in the X200 Pro Mini using a high PWM dimming frequency of 2,160 Hz. Our display measurement resulted in around 490 Hz.
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 361 Hz Amplitude: 19 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 361 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 361 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8354 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings
ColorOS' color display settings are extensive. There are three color profiles to choose from, in which you can additionally set the color temperature.
We used the Calman analysis software to examine deviations in its color calibration. The DeltaE values we measured for the individual colors as well as for greyscale are extremely low.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Outdoors, the X200 Pro Mini makes a very strong impression. Thanks to its impressive brightness, the display's content should always be very easy to see in direct sunlight in the summer as well as in the winter. We also have nothing to criticize in terms of its viewing angle stability. The OLED panel's colors remain stable even when tilted.
Performance - The compact Android phone with a high-end chip
If you want one of the best SoCs currently available in a smartphone, then the compact Vivo phone is the right choice for you. With its peak clock speed of 3.65 GHz, the Dimensity 9400 used in the X200 Pro Mini couldn't quite match the Geekbench values of a Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Xiaomi 15, but the Vivo phone still has plenty of power. The MediaTek chipset was particularly impressive in the AI benchmarks, relegating the competition to the back of the pack.
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (75143 - 81594, n=3) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 |
Geekbench AI | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (12898 - 13084, n=2) | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (9184 - 9453, n=2) | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (1433 - 1501, n=2) | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 |
The Immortalis-G925 GPU unit installed in the Dimensity 9400 works with 12 cores inside the X200 Pro Mini. Compared to a Xiaomi 15 with the Adreno 830, the Vivo phone's scores in the GFXBench and 3DMark tests were slightly lower. However, the former showed that even very demanding games should run at almost 50fps on the Vivo phone in 4K resolution—or at least some of the time.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
The X200 Pro Mini performed well when it came to its browser speed, and its benchmark results were good. Websites are loaded quickly during everyday use and can be scrolled through smoothly.
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (167.1 - 234, n=3) | |
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104) | |
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (15 - 17.7, n=3) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=103, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (147 - 225, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133) | |
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=153, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (56843 - 86943, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133) | |
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (432 - 660, n=3) | |
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104) |
* ... smaller is better
When it comes to storage speed, the phone's UFS 4.0 storage delivers outstanding performance. Its AndroBench values were very good, especially when writing and reading small data blocks.
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Xiaomi 15 | Sony Xperia 5 V | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -26% | -57% | -4% | -26% | 1% | -33% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3804.53 | 3701.23 -3% | 1717.9 -55% | 3934.92 3% | 1812.23 -52% | 3679 ? -3% | 2143 ? -44% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3384.34 | 1435.39 -58% | 253.53 -93% | 3889.06 15% | 1331.81 -61% | 3102 ? -8% | 1739 ? -49% |
Random Read 4KB | 302.11 | 373.12 24% | 218.41 -28% | 296.95 -2% | 359.71 19% | 382 ? 26% | 292 ? -3% |
Random Write 4KB | 532.65 | 175.98 -67% | 261.55 -51% | 360.36 -32% | 473.91 -11% | 469 ? -12% | 337 ? -37% |
Games - The Vivo phone manages 120fps
Due to its suboptimal cooling (see "Emissions" section), the X200 Pro Mini is by no means a perfect phone for gamers, but you can still run current games at a low level of detail using its native 120 Hz refresh rate.
During our test, we achieved the aforementioned 120 frames per second when playing the shooter PUBG Mobile with low graphics settings using GameBench. There weren't any notable drops in its frame rate. The demanding Genshin Impact ran just as well at 60fps with the best graphics—that's as good as it gets on Android at the moment.
Emissions - The Vivo X200 Pro Mini with powerful sound
Temperature
The pronounced temperature increase of the Dimensity 9400 caused the X200 Pro Mini to significantly throttle the system during the Wild Life stress tests of 3DMark. We measured a reduction of around 40 to 50 percent. This means that the compact flagship performs slightly better than its big brother, but worse than a Xiaomi 15. During a one-hour load phase with the Burnout benchmark, we noted a peak temperature of almost 46 °C in the camera area.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Sony Xperia 5 V | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 | |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini |
Speakers
The X200 Pro Mini's stereo speakers boast a pleasant sound and some light bass. However, its undulating presentation of mids and highs in the Pink Noise test was less than ideal. Nevertheless, for a compact smartphone, the Vivo phone's sound has a good depth.
If you want external sound output, you can use its wired USB port or wireless Bluetooth 5.4. The latter supports a decent number of codecs.
Vivo X200 Pro Mini audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia 5 V audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery life - The small phone with a big battery
In contrast to a Galaxy S24 (5,700 mAh), the X200 Pro Mini has a much larger 5,700 mAh battery that can be charged via USB-C at up to 90 watts. The energy storage device (21.78 Wh, 3.82 V) can also be charged wirelessly at a maximum of 30 watts. During our test, we noted a charging time of around 40 minutes.
At 1.6 watts, the X200 Pro Mini's power consumption in idle mode isn't very efficient. There is certainly room for some optimization here, although you do have to take into account the Vivo phone's bright display.
Power consumption
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 9 Pro 4700 mAh | Xiaomi 15 5400 mAh | Sony Xperia 5 V 5000 mAh | Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | 5% | 24% | 18% | 11% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.6 | 0.42 30% | 0.59 2% | 0.5 17% | 0.79 -32% | 0.543 ? 9% | 0.873 ? -46% |
Idle Average * | 1.6 | 0.93 42% | 1.1 31% | 1.11 31% | 1.08 32% | 1.387 ? 13% | 1.427 ? 11% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.5 | 1.07 57% | 1.2 52% | 1.13 55% | 1.12 55% | 1.743 ? 30% | 1.59 ? 36% |
Load Average * | 8.9 | 15.43 -73% | 7.15 20% | 8.91 -0% | 7.93 11% | 8.43 ? 5% | 7.14 ? 20% |
Load Maximum * | 11.2 | 16.51 -47% | 20.37 -82% | 9.3 17% | 8.78 22% | 11.2 ? -0% | 10.8 ? 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Runtimes
A large battery capacity helps the Vivo phone achieve very good runtimes. Our values with an adjusted display brightness (150 cd/m²) provide the best comparability, as they are the same for all test devices. Here, the X200 Pro Mini only stopped working after more than 19 hours when surfing using Wi-Fi, and its endurance for endless video playback without Wi-Fi was similarly strong at 35 hours. It should be mentioned that when its battery level is low (2 percent), all applications are automatically closed and the X200 Pro Mini goes into standby mode. Overall, the WLAN modem seems to consume quite a lot of power.
Vivo X200 Pro Mini 5700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 9 Pro 4700 mAh | Xiaomi 15 5400 mAh | Sony Xperia 5 V 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -30% | -12% | 16% | 1% | |
Reader / Idle | 3211 | 2398 -25% | 3759 17% | 2788 -13% | |
H.264 | 2098 | 1227 -42% | 1784 -15% | 1493 -29% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1153 | 880 -24% | 1017 -12% | 1367 19% | 952 -17% |
Load | 227 | 159 -30% | 326 44% | 371 63% |
Notebookcheck total rating
Vivo's X200 Pro manages to create a real flagship feeling inside a compact smartphone. The Mini model is closer to the "original" than many other manufacturers, especially when it comes to its cameras.
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 02/19/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.