
Apple Mac Mini M4 review - Smaller, faster and louder
The fastest single-core processor in the world.
Apple's Mac Mini has been given a major update, as aside from featuring the new M4 processor generation, the new model has become a lot smaller. We have tested the base version with the M4 SoC as well as 16 GB RAM and a 256-GB SSD for $599.Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict - The Mac Mini M4 is a good everyday computer
Apple has given its Mac Mini a completely new case that now fits its name better. Despite its much more compact dimensions, its connectivity has gotten better and there are finally ports on the front. However, the placement of the power button on the underside of the case is a clear design mistake. Furthermore, there still aren't any maintenance/upgrade options for end users, for example in the shape of a compact M.2 2242 SSD.
Inside the base version, the new M4 SoC has been combined with 16 GB RAM, which should be completely sufficient for the vast majority of everyday applications. In doing so, the M4 boasts extremely high single-core performance and the Mac Mini is often completely silent during everyday use. The fans only have to work a lot harder under very high load and in this case, the new Mac Mini M4 gets noticeably louder than its predecessor. The included software suite is a lot more extensive than on Windows PCs.
Aside from the missing upgrade options, Apple's prices for RAM and SSD upgrades continue to be massive disadvantages. Moreover, 256 GB of SSD storage isn't very up-to-date anymore and the surcharge for the 512-GB model ($200) is simply ridiculous.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
You can configure and purchase the new Mac Mini M4 directly via Apple's website. Alternatively, you can find the base model on Amazon for $574.
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apple Mac Mini M4 Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | 648 g | 50 mm | x | ||
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 649 US-Dollar | 653 g | 60 mm | x | |
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 829 EUR Geizhals Suche | 1.7 kg | 48 mm | x | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 622 g | 41 mm | x | ||
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Listenpreis 999 EUR | 548 g | 37 mm | x | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 Apple M2 ⎘ Apple M2 10-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.2 kg | 36 mm | x |
After the last Mac Mini wasn't available with the M3 processors, Apple has now launched an extensive redesign with its new M4 SoCs. Above all, the new Mac Mini has become significantly more compact and lightweight. You can choose between the two new Apple SoCs named M4 and M4 Pro (both variants). We have tested the new base model featuring the M4 SoC, 16 GB RAM and a 256 GB SSD for an MRSP of $599. The Mac Mini with the M4 Pro (24 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD) costs at least $1,399. The maximum you can spend is up to $4,699 (M4 Pro with 14 CPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 8 TB storage, 10 Gbit/s Ethernet).
Specifications
Case - The Mac Mini is now a lot more compact
The Mac Mini 2024 still has rounded corners, but its footprint of 12.7 x 12.7 cm is much more compact than its predecessor (20 x 20 cm). It is now effectively a small version of the Mac Studio. That will make a massive difference on your desk, and the new Mac Mini reminds us more of an Apple TV than the old model in terms of its size. However, at 5 cm, the new Mac Mini is also slightly taller than before (3.6 cm). As usual with Apple, its build quality and finish are excellent, and the power supply unit is already integrated into the device despite its low weight of 648 grams (for our entry-level configuration).
The power button must have been thought of late in the development process, as it is located on the underside in the back left corner. This means you can't press the button without lifting the Mac Mini. Although lots of Apple users rarely actually switch off their devices, this placement is still pretty unfortunate. You can open the case via the bottom using appropriate tools and after removing the large fan, the SSD module becomes visible. The module is proprietary, but could theoretically be replaced and upgrade kits will definitely be available in the future. However, the RAM cannot be upgraded.
Connectivity - Thunderbolt 4 and USB-C on the front
As part of its redesign, Apple has also revised the Mac Mini's connections. It now only features USB-C ports, with the three ports on the back supporting Thunderbolt 4 (Thunderbolt 5 on the M4 Pro)—plus, there are finally two ports on the front (USB C 3.2 Gen 2). This makes it much easier to connect removable storage devices or other accessories. The jack socket is also located on the front. Gigabit Ethernet is installed as standard, with 10 Gigabit Ethernet available optionally (+$100). Compared to the previous M3 SoCs, Apple has revised its display engine and now you can connect up to three external displays. However, it doesn't have a card reader. As with the current MacBook Pro models, its Wi-Fi module supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3, but not yet Wi-Fi 7. Its speed and stability were very good during the test using our reference router from Asus.
Networking | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Sustainability
Apple takes the issue of sustainability seriously and an environmental report for the Mac Mini is available on its product page. In addition to the manufacturer using a high level of recycled materials for the Mac Mini and its packaging, its use of environmentally friendly energy results in a CO2 footprint of 32 kg for the base model, which Apple offsets with CO2 certificates. The production of the Mac Mini is therefore climate-neutral.
Performance - The M4 Pro with 16 GB RAM
The base model of the Mac Mini M4 is equipped with 16 GB RAM, and you can optionally go for 24 or 32 GB RAM. Those who opt for the M4 Pro can choose between 24, 48 or 64 GB RAM.
Testing conditions
The Mac Mini with the M4 SoC doesn't feature any energy profiles—only the familiar power-saving mode.
Processor - M4 with 10 CPU cores
We are already familiar with the M4 SoC from the current iPad Pro but in this case, only variants with the 10-core CPU are used (6 E-cores, 4 P-cores). The core configuration therefore differs significantly from the M4 Pro/Max models, which only have four efficiency cores. The new M4's P-cores reach a maximum of 4.464 GHz (and thus ~50 MHz less than the M4 Pro) or 3.93 GHz when all cores are loaded. The E-cores operate at a maximum of 2.89 GHz.
In the single-core tests, the processor consumed around 5.2 watts, which was even slightly less than the M3 SoC. Its single-core performance has nevertheless been significantly increased and the new M4 chips are the fastest single-core CPUs currently on the market. During the native benchmarks Cinebench 2024/R23 and Geekbench, the new M4 turned out to be vastly superior to the competition.
In the multi-core tests, the new M4 consumed a maximum of 21.5 watts, which the Mac Mini could easily maintain even under continuous load. In the Cinebench 2024 test, the new M4 was only just beaten by the Core Ultra 9 185H (65 watts) and the Ryzen 7 8700G (65 watts) inside direct competitor models. The M4 even had an advantage in the Geekbench test, but fell behind the competition from AMD/Intel in the older Cinebench R23 test. All-in-all, however, this is still an outstanding performance and its advantage over the old Mac Mini with the M2 SoC was more than 50% in most cases.
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
System performance
Despite its entry-level configuration, the new Mac Mini M4 is a very fast and responsive computer. We had no problems during our test and subjectively, the small desktop PC feels just as fast as the MacBook Pro 16 with the M4 Max. Of course, the M4 SoC will eventually reach its limits when handling very demanding tasks, but for most casual users, the new Mac Mini should cover all needs. The test device performed very well in the synthetic benchmarks (especially the browser tests). Thanks to its built-in Neural Engine, it also supports Apple Intelligence, although the new iPhone synchronization is not available in Germany (where this test was carried out).
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Jetstream 2: 2.0 Total Score
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 |
Jetstream 2 / 2.0 Total Score | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
The days of very slow storage thankfully seem to be a thing of the past at Apple, but the same unfortunately can't be said for limited storage capacity. The AP0256Z SSD in our test device achieved transfer rates of 2-3 GB/s, which is definitely enough for normal everyday use. However, 256 GB of storage (of which 214 GB is available after first booting up the device) is simply no longer up to date. The Mac Mini M4 is available with a maximum of 2 TB, and the M4 Pro models with 8 TB of SSD storage—but as usual, Apple charges enormous surcharges for more storage. For example, an upgrade from 256 to 512 GB costs $200. In this case, you should consider expanding the Mac Mini's storage more affordably with the help of external SSDs or NAS systems.
Graphics card
The M4 SoC's integrated GPU features 10 cores and consumes a maximum of 18 watts compared to the old M3 SoC's 20-21 watts. Nevertheless, its GPU performance has been increased by around 15-20% and its advantage over the old Mac Mini with the M2 SoC has become even greater. It clearly beat the direct mini PC competition with the Radeon 780M or Arc Graphics 8-Core, but for better classification, we have also included the two fastest variants of the Radeon 890M and Arc Graphics 140V in the comparison. Both during the Steel Nomad Light and GFX-Bench tests, the two latest iGPUs from AMD/Intel also proved to be inferior—only the OpenCL performance of the Radeon 890M was slightly better. The fastest Qualcomm Snapdragon GPU, the Adreno X1-85 (with 4.6 TFLOPS), was also significantly slower.
The tables turned somewhat in the gaming benchmarks—but it should be noted that only Baldur's Gate 3 runs natively on the Mac Mini. In this scenario, the M4 SoC came just ahead of the two fastest variants of the Radeon 890M and the Arc Graphics 140V. However, all other games had to be emulated, which came at the cost of some performance. This also brings us to another problem, because the selection of available native games (apart from iPhone/iPad games) is simply limited compared to Windows.
Geekbench 6.4: GPU OpenCL | GPU Metal
GFXBench: 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU |
Geekbench 6.4 / GPU Metal | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 |
Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100 |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 120 | 42.8 | 28.6 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 141 | 50 | 47 | 41 | 27 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 44.3 | 36.4 | 32.3 | 30.1 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 34.8 | 28.1 | 23.8 | 20.4 | |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 54.9 | 46.4 | 45 | 40.8 | 27.1 |
Emissions & power
Noise emissions
The Mac Mini uses a large fan at the bottom of its case, both in models with the M4 and the M4 Pro. Even so, the latter is equipped with a slightly larger heat sink. The fan always runs at 1,000 rpm, even when idling, but this can only be read out; it cannot be heard or measured. Only from ~1,200 rpm do you start to hear a slight noise in a quiet room. When gaming (~1,250 rpm), the Mac is therefore barely audible (24.9 dB(A). Under maximum CPU load (~1,800 rpm, 30.3 dB(A)) and above all during our stress test, we were able to push the Mac Mini harder, which was met with a maximum fan speed of 2,950 rpm—or a clearly audible 45.1 dB(A). However, there is still a lot of room for improvement in this respect, as the fan can reach a maximum of 4,900 rpm (59.4 dB(A)), which we could only trigger manually. Overall, the new Mac Mini M4 is noticeably louder under high load than the Mac Mini M2 and the configurations with the M4 Pro are likely to be even louder. There were no other electronic noises coming from our test device.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.1 / 24.1 / 24.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 24.1 / 45.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Apple Mac Mini M4 M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -14% | -34% | -29% | -28% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 24.1 | 24.3 -1% | 24.8 -3% | 24.6 -2% | 24.9 -3% | 24.7 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.1 | 27.5 -14% | 33.9 -41% | 24.7 -2% | 24.9 -3% | 24.7 -2% |
Idle Average * | 24.1 | 27.6 -15% | 34 -41% | 29.6 -23% | 24.9 -3% | 24.7 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.1 | 27.6 -15% | 34 -41% | 29.8 -24% | 24.9 -3% | 24.7 -2% |
Load Average * | 24.1 | 36 -49% | 41.1 -71% | 45.7 -90% | 50.1 -108% | 24.7 -2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 30.3 | 35.4 -17% | 42.2 -39% | 47.7 -57% | 50 -65% | |
Load Maximum * | 45.1 | 38.2 15% | 46.2 -2% | 47.4 -5% | 50.2 -11% | 29.4 35% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
Surface temperatures are of course of secondary importance for a desktop PC, but even during the stress test, the Mac Mini M4 remained super cool with a maximum of ~30 °C on the top. We measured a peak of 39 °C at the fan outlet (at the rear of the underside). It got significantly hotter inside, at least during the stress test. In this case, the M4 SoC quickly reached 102 °C and remained constant at this level. The fan would technically still have a lot of room to maneuver, but as usual with Apple, these high temperatures are tolerated well. In the stress test with combined CPU/GPU load, the M4 briefly consumed up to 37.5 watts and then stabilized at ~34/35 watts during the further course, thus remaining almost constant.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 36 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.4 °C / 90 F.
Speakers
The Mac Mini still comes equipped with one speaker and Apple has significantly improved its quality compared to the old model. Its sound is loud and quite usable if you are only watching some background music or YouTube videos, for example.
Apple Mac Mini M4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple Mac Mini M2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
When idling, the new Mac Mini M4 consumes between 2.6-2.7 watts and is therefore very frugal compared to the competition. Its values for standby mode and when switched off also gave no cause for criticism. We measured around 40 watts when gaming and a maximum of 62.5 watts at the beginning of the stress test, which then leveled off at 57-58 watts later on. Its combination of high performance and low consumption additionally becomes clearly noticeable when it comes to its CPU efficiency, although we can only use data from the older Cinebench R23 within the comparison group. In the newer Cinebench 2024, the M4's lead would be even greater.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Apple Mac Mini M4 M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU | Average Apple M4 10-core GPU | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -189% | -216% | -156% | -260% | 12% | -30% | -226% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 8.2 -215% | 8.8 -238% | 4.2 -62% | 14 -438% | 2.2 15% | 2.47 ? 5% | 9.74 ? -275% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.7 | 14.6 -441% | 14 -419% | 13 -381% | 19.5 -622% | 2.6 4% | 7.57 ? -180% | 15.5 ? -474% |
Load Average * | 31.5 | 73.9 -135% | 93.2 -196% | 68.5 -117% | 76.4 -143% | 28.7 9% | 25.6 ? 19% | 60.1 ? -91% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 39.6 | 79.9 -102% | 102.1 -158% | 74.1 -87% | 54.3 -37% | |||
Load Maximum * | 62.5 | 95.3 -52% | 105.4 -69% | 144.9 -132% | 99.1 -59% | 51.5 18% | 40.7 ? 35% | 102.8 ? -64% |
Idle Average * | 10 | 12.6 | 7.2 | 15.9 | 8.46 ? | 12 ? |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency overview
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Minisforum MS-A1 |
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Apple Mac Mini M4 | |
Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
Geekom AX8 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Minisforum MS-A1 |
Power consumption with external monitor
Power consumption with external monitor
Notebookcheck total rating
All-in-all, the new Mac Mini M4 is a good mini PC. Thanks to its new M4 processor, its CPU performance is very good and the device remains mostly silent during simple everyday tasks despite its significantly more compact case. The small Mac only becomes significantly louder than its predecessor under very high load. The ports on the front are super handy, but the placement of the power button is not. The base model for $599 is very interesting in terms of its price, but as usual, Apple makes upgrades very expensive indeed.
Apple Mac Mini M4
- 11/15/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.